Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have investigated the effects of hyperpolarization and depolarization, and the presence of K(+) and/or Ca(2+), on (22)Na(+) influx into corn (Zea mays L.) root segments. In freshly excised root tissue which is injured, Na(+) influx is unaffected by hyperpolarization with fusicoccin, or depolarization with uncoupler (protonophore), or by addition of K(+). However, added Ca(2+) suppresses Na(+) influx by 60%. In washed tissue which has recovered, Na(+) influx is doubled over that of freshly excised tissue, and the influx is increased by fusicoccin and suppressed by uncoupler. This energy-linked component of Na(+) influx is completely eliminated by low concentrations of K(+), leaving the same level and kind of Na(+) influx seen in freshly excised roots. The K(+)-sensitive energy linkage appears to be by the carrier for active K(+) influx. Calcium is equally inhibitory to Na(+) influx in washed as in fresh tissue. Other divalent cations are only slightly less effective. Net Na(+) uptake was about 25% of (22)Na(+) influx, but proportionately the response to K(+) and Ca(2+) was about the same.The constancy of K(+)-insensitive Na(+) influx under conditions known to hyperpolarize and depolarize suggests that if Na(+) transport is by means of a voltage-sensitive channel, the rise or fall of channel resistance must be proportional to the rise or fall in potential difference. The alternative is a passive electroneutral exchange of (22)Na(+) for endogenous Na(+). The data suggest that an inwardly directed Na(+) current is largely offset by an efflux current, giving both a small net uptake and isotopic exchange.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacoby et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: