Key result
Dabigatran significantly increased the activated protein C resistance ratio in both normal subjects and Factor V Leiden carriers, potentially leading to misclassification of patients.
Why the study?
Does dabigatran interfere with prothrombinase-based assays for detecting activated protein C resistance in normal subjects and factor V Leiden carriers?
Observational (n=18)
No
Does dabigatran interfere with prothrombinase-based assays for detecting activated protein C resistance in normal subjects and factor V Leiden carriers?
Dabigatran interferes with prothrombinase-based assays for activated protein C resistance, which can lead to false-negative results and misclassification of factor V Leiden carriers.
Clinicians should interpret APC resistance results cautiously on dabigatran; leaves open need for assay adjustments or alternatives in carriers.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate ex vivo and in vitro interference of a direct factor IIa inhibitor, dabigatran, on a prothrombinase-based assay to detect activated protein C resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An ex vivo study was performed in six heterozygous factor V Leiden carriers and 12 normal subjects without the factor V Leiden mutation who were treated with dabigatran. An in vitro study was also performed considering 12 plasma samples (six from normal subjects and six from heterozygous factor V Leiden carriers) spiked with dabigatran. The dabigatran concentration was evaluated using a diluted thrombin time assay, activated protein C resistance was evaluated using a prothrombinase-based assay. RESULTS: In both the ex vivo and in vitro studies dabigatran interfered significantly with activated protein C resistance ratios observed in normal subjects and in factor V Leiden heterozygous carriers. DISCUSSION: The results reported in this paper seem to confirm that dabigatran is able to interfere with the Penthafarm prothrombinase-based assay used to study activated protein C resistance, significantly increasing observed ratios. This effect appears to be present already at low concentrations of dabigatran (6 ng/mL) and affects both normal subjects and heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden. In this group of patients, dabigatran, at concentrations in the therapeutic range (100-200 ng/mL), could markedly increase the activated protein C resistance ratio, bringing it up to within the reference range for normal subjects, thus potentially leading to misclassification of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gessoni et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=18). Dabigatran vs. Baseline (no dabigatran) was evaluated on Activated protein C resistance (APCr) ratio. Dabigatran significantly increased the activated protein C resistance ratio in both normal subjects and Factor V Leiden carriers, potentially leading to misclassification of patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: