Optical non-contact techniques are very interesting for 3D characterization of sensitive and complex engineering surfaces. Unfortunately, the application of optical techniques was for many years restricted to selected types of surfaces which have only moderate variations of height and surface slope relative to their lateral resolution and measurement field. Owing to the fact that artefacts and form deviations occur with high spatial frequencies in optically measured topographs, there were some difficulties in interpreting the results and comparing them with the tactile standard techniques for surface characterization. Furthermore, artefacts in optically measured profiles have often been misinterpreted in terms of the resolution of optical techniques being higher than that of the tactile techniques. This paper presents two optical methods of confocal microscopy for highly accurate characterization of surfaces. The first method works on measurement fields of less than 1 and is in practice absolutely comparable to the mechanical stylus instrument, even on rough surfaces. For this method results compare very well not only in surface statistics but also in topographic raw data, as will be demonstrated for the PTB roughness standards. The second method works on measurement fields up to square centimetres.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jordan et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: