Key result
Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 positive players during rugby matches did not result in confirmed in-match viral transmission, despite frequent close proximity interactions and tackles.
Why the study?
To examine interactions between SARS-CoV-2 positive players and other players during rugby league matches and determine within-match transmission risk.
Does participation in rugby league matches with SARS-CoV-2 positive players increase the risk of in-match viral transmission?
Observational (n=136)
Yes
Does participation in rugby league matches with SARS-CoV-2 positive players increase the risk of in-match viral transmission?
Despite frequent close-proximity interactions and tackles with SARS-CoV-2 positive players, in-match viral transmission during outdoor professional rugby league matches was not confirmed.
Reassures on low in-match transmission risk during outdoor rugby; leaves open generalizability to other sports, settings, and variants.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the interactions between SARS-CoV-2 positive players and other players during rugby league matches and determine within-match SARS-CoV-2 transmission risk. METHODS: Four Super League matches in which SARS-CoV-2 positive players were subsequently found to have participated were analysed. Players were identified as increased-risk contacts, and player interactions and proximities were analysed by video footage and global positioning system (GPS) data. The primary outcome was new positive cases of SARS-CoV-2 within 14 days of the match in increased-risk contacts and other players participating in the matches. RESULTS: Out of 136 total players, there were 8 SARS-CoV-2 positive players, 28 players identified as increased-risk contacts and 100 other players in the matches. Increased-risk contacts and other players were involved in 11.4±9.0 (maximum 32) and 4.0±5.2 (maximum 23) tackles, respectively. From GPS data, increased-risk contacts and other players were within 2 m of SARS-CoV-2 positive players on 10.4±18.0 (maximum 88) and 12.5±20.7 (maximum 121) occasions, totalling 65.7±137.7 (maximum 689) and 89.5±169.4 (maximum 1003) s, respectively. Within 14 days of the match, one increased-risk contact and five players returned positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) tests, and 27 increased-risk contacts and 95 other participants returned negative SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests. Positive cases were most likely traced to social interactions, car sharing and wider community transmission and not linked to in-match transmission. CONCLUSION: Despite tackle involvements and close proximity interactions with SARS-CoV-2 positive players, in-match SARS-CoV-2 transmission was not confirmed. While larger datasets are needed, these findings suggest rugby presents a lower risk of viral transmission than previously predicted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jones et al. (2021) conducted an observational in SARS-CoV-2 transmission (n=136). Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 positive players during rugby matches vs. Other players in the match was evaluated on New positive cases of SARS-CoV-2 within 14 days of the match in increased-risk contacts and other players participating in the matches. Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 positive players during rugby matches did not result in confirmed in-match viral transmission, despite frequent close proximity interactions and tackles.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: