Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
As different light-driven photocatalysts, Zn 0.28 Cd 0.72 S and TiO 2 showed different properties in the photocatalytic process. In this paper, the comparison was carried out among the properties of Zn 0.28 Cd 0.72 S-visible, Zn 0.28 Cd 0.72 S-UV, and TiO 2 -UV light systems in the degradation of methyl orange. After the addition of different types of active species quenchers and the results detected by electron spin resonance, a photoluminescence technique, and a photometric method, it was found that, in the Zn 0.28 Cd 0.72 S-UV system, O 2, •OH, and holes played a bigger role, whereas in the TiO 2 -UV system, •OH and holes predominated; in the Zn 0.28 Cd 0.72 S-visible light system, O 2 and holes contributed to the degradation. The differences between the two catalysts lead us to realize the active species and the degradation mechanism in photocatalytic process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: