Several test methods were employed to determine polymer fracture toughness (š¢ Ic , the openingāmode strain energy release rate) at room temperature. The materials used included DGEBA epoxies and those modified by the addition of CTBN elastomers. Doubleācantilever beam specimens were used to determine the fracture toughness both of bulk resins and of an adhesive layer bonded between two aluminum halfābeams. The adhesive fracture toughness of a 0.025ācm bond was slightly less than the bulk š¢ Ic value, attributed to the bond thickness effect. Fracture toughness of bulk resins was also evaluated by using both rectangular and round compact tension specimens. The results, when compared with those obtained with the bulk doubleācantilever beams, are quite acceptable. The thickness of compact tension specimens, ranging from 0.64 to 1.0 cm, might not give pure planeāstrain conditions, and thus some planeāstress contribution to š¢ Ic should be expected for the tougher materials. Izod impact tests were also carried out to determine sample fracture toughness at high loading rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ting et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: