This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Strength measurements and fractography were used to investigate the failure of alumina‐glass dental composites containing 75 vol% alumina and 25 vol% glass. Alumina compacts were prepared by slip casting and sintering at 1100°C for 2 h. Dense composites were made by infiltrating partially sintered alumina with glass at 1150°C for 8 h. Young's modulus and the hardness of the composites were 270 GPa and 12 GPa, respectively. The mean strength (460 MPa) and fracture toughness (4.0 MPa·m 1/2 ) of the composites were insensitive to the glass thermal expansion coefficient (α glass = 5.9 × 10 −6 to 7.8 × 10 −6 °C −1 ). Typical flaws were pores and cracklike voids formed by poor particle packing and differential sintering near agglomerates of alumina in the composite. Crack deflection and crack bridging were observed in indentation cracks. Fracture toughness was single‐valued because the alumina particle size was small (∼3 μm). Alumina‐glass composites are promising new ceramics for dental crown and bridge applications, because their strength and fracture toughness are ∼2 times greater than those of current dental ceramics.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wolf et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: