Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Racial/ethnic minority groups are underrepresented in clinical trials with American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) people having the lowest representation. This article aims to contribute to the literature to address that gap by sharing the results of the use of anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies among AI/AN people at risk for severe COVID-19. Methods: This retrospective cohort study assessed data from ambulatory AI/AN patients enrolled in Cherokee Nation Health Services in Northeastern Oklahoma, who had a positive test for SARS-CoV-2, high risk for progression, and were offered anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody treatment active against the circulating SARS-CoV-2 strain from December 1, 2020, to April 16, 2021. The outcomes of interest were all-cause and COVID-19-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, intensive care admissions, and deaths within 28 days of being offered treatment. Results: Among 1,447 participants, 813 (56.2%) were treated and 634 (43.8%) were not. When adjusted for potential confounders, there was a significant difference in the odds of treated versus untreated patients experiencing a COVID-19-related emergency department visit (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.63) and hospitalization (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03-0.31). Discussion: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody treatment was associated with lower odds of COVID-19-related emergency department visits and hospitalization among high-risk AI/AN patients. Health Equity Implications: To advance health equity, it is critical to have representation of AI/AN in clinical trials and other research. This project is an example of how community partnerships with AI/AN health systems can strengthen the evidence for new and emerging treatments, address past harm, and advance equity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mera et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: