Key result
Prediabetes diagnosed by HbA1c was associated with an increased number of coronary lesions (median 2 vs 1, p=0.03) and a worse cardiometabolic profile compared to normoglycemic individuals.
Why the study?
Does HbA1c identify a worse cardiometabolic profile and more severe coronary artery disease than fasting plasma glucose in patients with prediabetes undergoing coronary angiography?
Cross-Sectional (n=514)
No
Does HbA1c identify a worse cardiometabolic profile and more severe coronary artery disease than fasting plasma glucose in patients with prediabetes undergoing coronary angiography?
HbA1c is more effective than fasting plasma glucose in identifying prediabetic individuals with a high cardiovascular risk profile and more severe coronary artery disease among patients undergoing coronary angiography.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change prediabetes screening in angiography patients; leaves open whether HbA1c outperforms fasting glucose for lesion burden.
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus has well known deleterious effects on coronary artery disease (CAD). The role of milder hyperglycemic states such as prediabetes (PD) on CAD is debatable. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) has recently been advocated as a diagnostic tool for diabetes mellitus (DM) and PD. This study aims to assess the cardiometabolic risk profile and coronary lesions of patients with PD undergoing coronary angiography identified either by fasting plasma glucose (FPG) or HbA1c levels. METHODS: We studied 514 individuals without previously known glucose disturbances. Their glycemic status was assessed by FPG and HbA1c (HPLC) and classified according to ADA guidelines, using each parameter independently, as having normal glucose tolerance (N), PD, or DM. CAD was defined as stenosis greater than 50% in one major coronary vessel or branch. Framingham score was calculated. RESULTS: Subjects with PD had a similar frequency of CAD compared do N individuals by both FPG (61 vs. 59.3%) and HbA1c (55.4 vs 61.2%) (p non-significant for linear-by-linear association). PD individuals identified by FPG had worse HOMA2B (mean [95% CI] 65.4 [60.9-69.9] vs. 76.6 [71.4-81.9]) and HOMA2-IR (1.10 [0.98-1.22] vs. 0.80 [0.72-0.89]) when compared to N controls. PD individuals identified by HbA1c had higher frequency of Framingham risk above 20% (25.4 vs 11.8%), arterial hypertension (87.8 vs 72.6%), and dyslipidemia (83.8 vs 72%) compared to N individuals. PD associated with an increased number of coronary lesions only when diagnosed by HbA1c (median [interquartile interval] 2 [0-4] PD versus 1 [0-3.75] N, p = 0.03 for trend). CONCLUSIONS: HbA1c was more effective than FPG in identifying individuals with PD associated with high cardiovascular risk profile in a sample of individuals undergoing coronary angiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piveta et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Prediabetes / Coronary Artery Disease (n=514). Prediabetes identified by HbA1c vs. Normal glucose tolerance (normoglycemic individuals) was evaluated on Number of coronary lesions (median) (p=0.03 for trend). Prediabetes diagnosed by HbA1c was associated with an increased number of coronary lesions (median 2 vs 1, p=0.03) and a worse cardiometabolic profile compared to normoglycemic individuals.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: