Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thirty-six milks pre-analyzed by accepted standard methods were analyzed with Milko-scan instruments at 6 laboratories. Using pairs comparisons as described by Youden, precision errors for fat were about 0.033% for the first and 0.022% for the second of duplicate tests, indicating a carry-over effect for the first tests. Precision errors for protein were about 0.021% for both tests. Systematic errors for fat were about 0.17% with calibrations based on reference analyses at each laboratory but were reduced to about 0.044% with calibrations by reference analyses from one laboratory. With homogenized milks, systematic errors for fat increased to about 0.07% and were larger at high fat levels. This effect could be minimized by changing the wavelength of maximum transmission for the fat filter. Systematic errors of about 0.067% for protein were reduced to about 0.03% with calibrations based on common reference analyses. Satisfactory calibrations for lactose were obtained with the 2 Milko-scan 203 models with standard errors of estimate of 0.034 and 0.033%. Results for homogenized and unhomogenized milk were different for most instruments, indicating the need to calibrate for them separately.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D.A. Biggs (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: