Key result
CTP mismatch ratio ≥7.1 is linked to ~5-fold higher odds of ICAD-related occlusion.
Why the study?
Does the perfusion mismatch ratio derived from automated CTP predict underlying ICAD in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion?
Cohort (n=1,485)
Yes
Does the perfusion mismatch ratio derived from automated CTP predict underlying ICAD in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion?
A perfusion mismatch ratio ≥7.1 derived from automated CTP is a strong predictor of ICAD-related large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke, which may aid in planning endovascular treatment.
BACKGROUND: The ability to differentiate intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) related large vessel occlusion (LVO) from embolism is critical for stroke management. We hypothesized that the mismatch ratio derived from the automated computed tomography perfusion (CTP) could predict underlying ICAD. METHODS: Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and LVO from prospective registry databases who underwent CTP were included in the derivation cohort (n=1100). The mismatch ratio, calculated as the ratio of the hypo-perfused volume to the infarct core volume by software, was defined. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the predictive performance of the mismatch ratio for ICAD, and logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of LVO associated with underlying ICAD. External validation was conducted using cohorts from two other stroke centers (n=385). RESULTS: In the derivation cohort, 390 patients were classified as ICAD and 720 as embolism. The ICAD group had a higher mismatch ratio (9.8 vs 3.6, P<0.001). The mismatch ratio outperformed age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score in predicting ICAD (area under the curve (AUC), 0.77 vs 0.36 vs 0.28, P<0.001). The ROC curve had a best cut-off of 7.1 for predicting ICAD, which was an independent predictor of ICAD-related occlusion (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 5.43, 95% CI 3.68 to 8.03), with 68% sensitivity and 76% specificity. These results were validated in an external cohort (AUC=0.78; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.83). CONCLUSION: The perfusion mismatch ratio may be an optimal and simple predictor of anterior circulation ICAD- related LVO before endovascular treatment (EVT). When this ratio was ≥7.1, ICAD was five times more likely than embolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yi et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (n=1,485). Perfusion mismatch ratio ≥7.1 vs. Perfusion mismatch ratio <7.1 was evaluated on Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) related occlusion (aOR 5.43, 95% CI 3.68-8.03). A perfusion mismatch ratio ≥7.1 derived from computed tomography perfusion independently predicted intracranial atherosclerotic disease-related occlusion (aOR 5.43; 95% CI 3.68-8.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: