Key result
A 1-year lifestyle intervention significantly reduced the development of a hypertensive response to exercise compared with usual care (29.8% vs 59.5%, P=0.006) in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
Does lifestyle intervention improve exercise blood pressure and reduce left ventricular mass in patients with type 2 diabetes?
RCT (n=185)
Does lifestyle intervention improve exercise blood pressure and reduce left ventricular mass in patients with type 2 diabetes?
A 1-year lifestyle intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes attenuates the development of a hypertensive response to exercise but does not reduce left ventricular mass.
Supports lifestyle intervention to curb hypertensive exercise responses in type 2 diabetes; extends hemodynamic data but leaves left ventricular mass effects open.
PURPOSE: A hypertensive response to exercise (HRE) is common in patients with type 2 diabetes and is associated with increased left ventricular (LV) mass and mortality. This study aimed to determine whether lifestyle modification would improve exercise blood pressure (BP) and reduce LV mass in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-five patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to 1 yr of lifestyle intervention (n=97, mean ± SD age=54.7 ± 11.3 yr, 51% men) or usual care (control; n=88, age=53.8 ± 8.1 yr, 61% men). Brachial BP was measured at rest and during a graded maximal exercise test at baseline and 1 yr. Patients also underwent two-dimensional echocardiography to determine LV dimensions. A subgroup of 61 patients had resting and exercise central BP estimated from radial tonometry. An HRE was defined as a maximal exercise systolic BP of ≥210 mm Hg for men and ≥190 mm Hg for women. RESULTS: At study entry, there were 101 patients (55%) with an HRE (n=51 controls). Compared with controls, lifestyle intervention significantly reduced the propensity to develop an HRE in those participants who did not have HRE at baseline (29.8% vs 59.5%, P=0.006). However, absolute values of exercise and resting (brachial and central) BP and LV mass were not significantly changed (all P values >0.05). There were significant (all P values <0.05) improvements in V˙O2max, body mass index, plasma glucose, insulin resistance, and HDL cholesterol after lifestyle intervention compared with control. CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle intervention significantly attenuates the development of an HRE but does not reduce cardiac size after 1 yr in patients with type 2 diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schultz et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes (n=185). Lifestyle intervention vs. Usual care was evaluated on Development of a hypertensive response to exercise (HRE) in participants without HRE at baseline (p=0.006). A 1-year lifestyle intervention significantly reduced the development of a hypertensive response to exercise compared with usual care (29.8% vs 59.5%, P=0.006) in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: