Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Gaura lindheimeri Engelm. & Gray ‘Siskiyou Pink’ (gaura) and Phlox paniculata L. ‘David’ (garden phlox) were grown for 5 weeks in substrates irrigated at volumetric water contents (Θ) of 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, 0.35, 0.40, or 0.45 m 3 ·m −3 using a capacitance sensor-controlled irrigation system. Volumetric water contents of the substrate measured by the capacitance sensors controlling irrigation were correlated with measurements with a separate handheld meter ( r 2 = 0.83) and with volumetric water content set points throughout the study ( r 2 > 0.98). Only 3.8 (at an irrigation set point of 0.10 m 3 ·m −3 ) to 53 L (0.45 m 3 ·m −3 ) of water was used to irrigate gaura and phlox and 0 to 7.74 L of this water leached out of the substrates. Significant leaching occurred only at Θ set points of 0.40, or 0.45 m 3 ·m −3 . Gaura had shorter and fewer branches and reduced dry weight when grown at lower volumetric water contents, but plants irrigated at set points above 0.25 m 3 ·m −3 were large enough to be marketable. Gaura may be grown with capacitance sensor-automated irrigation using water efficiently and minimizing or eliminating leachate and thus nonpoint source pollution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burnett et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: