Key result
Patients with RVOT PVCs had significantly worse right ventricle global longitudinal strain compared to healthy controls (-19.4% vs -22.5%, P=0.015), indicating sub-clinical myocardial dysfunction.
Why the study?
Does right ventricular longitudinal strain differ between patients with right ventricular outflow tract premature ventricular contractions and healthy controls?
Case-Control (n=34)
Does right ventricular longitudinal strain differ between patients with right ventricular outflow tract premature ventricular contractions and healthy controls?
Absolute Event Rate: -19.4% vs -22.5%
p-value: p=0.015
Patients with apparently idiopathic RVOT PVCs exhibit sub-clinical right ventricular myocardial dysfunction as detected by speckle tracking echocardiography.
May indicate subclinical RV dysfunction in RVOT PVCs; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
CONTEXT: Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) originating in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) are traditionally considered idiopathic and benign. Echocardiographic conventional measurements are typically normal. AIMS: To assess whether right ventricle longitudinal strain, determined by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography, differ between RVOT PVCs patients (treated with catheter ablation) and healthy controls. METHODS: We retrospectively selected patients with PVCs from the RVOT who underwent electrophysiological study and catheter ablation between 2016 and 2019. Patients with documented structural heart disease were excluded. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed and right ventricle global longitudinal strain (RV-GLS), free wall longitudinal strain (RVFW-LS) and left ventricle global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) were determined as well as conventional ultrasound measurements of RV and LV function. RESULTS: We studied 21 patients with RVOT PVCs and 13 controls. Patients with PVCs from the RVOT had lower values of RV-GLS and RVFW-LS compared with the control group (-19.4% versus -22.5%, P = 0.015 and -22.1% versus -25.5, P = 0.041, respectively). They also had lower values of LV-GLS, although still within the normal range (-19.1% versus -20.9%, P = 0.047). Regarding RVOT PVCs patients only, RV-GLS and RVFW-LS had no correlation with the PVCs burden prior to catheter ablation and they did not differ between the patients in whom the catheter ablation was successful and those in whom it was not. RV-GLS also had a positive correlation with RVOT proximal diameter (r = 0.487, P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In this group of RVOT PVCs patients, we found worse RV longitudinal strain values (and therefore sub-clinical myocardial dysfunction) when compared to healthy controls.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fonseca et al. (2021) conducted a case-control in Premature ventricular contractions of the right ventricular outflow tract (n=34). Premature ventricular contractions of the right ventricular outflow tract vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Right ventricle global longitudinal strain (RV-GLS) (p=0.015). Patients with RVOT PVCs had significantly worse right ventricle global longitudinal strain compared to healthy controls (-19.4% vs -22.5%, P=0.015), indicating sub-clinical myocardial dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: