Key result
Levosimendan did not significantly increase 30-day mortality compared to dobutamine in critical patients with acute heart failure and severe renal dysfunction (HR 0.65).
Why the study?
Levosimendan use in acute heart failure is limited by a lack of evidence in patients with severely abnormal renal function.
Does levosimendan improve short- and long-term mortality compared to dobutamine in critical patients with acute heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, including those with severe renal dysfunction?
Cohort (n=1,095)
Yes
Does levosimendan improve short- and long-term mortality compared to dobutamine in critical patients with acute heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, including those with severe renal dysfunction?
Hazard Ratio: 0.65 (95% CI 0.3–1.37)
Absolute Event Rate: 23.3% vs 34.6%
p-value: p=0.254
Levosimendan is a safe alternative to dobutamine that does not increase short- or long-term mortality in critical patients with acute heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, regardless of renal function.
Supports levosimendan as alternative in acute HF with severe renal impairment; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation.
Background Acute heart failure is a life-threatening clinical condition. Levosimendan is an effective inotropic agent used to maintain cardiac output, but its usage is limited by the lack of evidence in patients with severely abnormal renal function. Therefore, we analyzed data of patients with acute heart failure with and without abnormal renal function to examine the effects of levosimendan. Methods We performed this retrospective cohort study using data from the Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD) of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH). Patients admitted for heart failure with LVEF ≤ 40% between January 2013 and December 2018 who received levosimendan or dobutamine in the critical cardiac care units (CCU) were identified. Patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were excluded. Outcomes of interest were mortality at 30, 90, and 180 days after the cohort entry date. Results There were no significant differences in mortality rate at 30, 90, and 180 days after the cohort entry date between the levosimendan and dobutamine groups, or between subgroups of patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or on dialysis. The results were consistent before and after propensity score matching. Conclusions Levosimendan did not increase short- or long-term mortality rates in critical patients with acute heart failure and reduced ejection fraction compared to dobutamine, regardless of their renal function. An eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 was not necessarily considered a contraindication for levosimendan in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Acute heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n=1,095). Levosimendan vs. Dobutamine was evaluated on 30-day mortality in patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or on dialysis (after propensity score matching) (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.30-1.37, p=0.254). Levosimendan did not significantly increase 30-day mortality compared to dobutamine in critical patients with acute heart failure and severe renal dysfunction (HR 0.65).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: