Key result
Real time 3D echocardiography showed good linear correlation with cardiac magnetic resonance for quantifying left ventricular mass in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients (r=0.63, P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does real time three-dimensional echocardiography accurately quantify left ventricular mass compared to cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Cross-Sectional (n=48)
Does real time three-dimensional echocardiography accurately quantify left ventricular mass compared to cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Real time three-dimensional echocardiography is an accurate method for quantifying left ventricular mass in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, showing better agreement with CMR than conventional M-mode.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports 3D echocardiography for LV mass quantification in HCM; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have irregular ventricular shapes with small and sometimes obliterated cavities at end-systole that affect the quantification of left ventricular mass (LVM) by conventional methods, such as M-mode or two-dimensional echocardiography. The goal of this study was to validate the use of real time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) to quantify LVM using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) as a reference, in a large population of patients with different types of HCM. METHODS: Forty-eight consecutive patients with HCM had a complete transthoracic examination and CMR performed within 7 days. LVM was calculated by M-mode and RT3DE and compared to CMR that served as gold standard. RESULTS: Left ventricular mass calculated by RT3DE was 195 ± 41 g and 187 ± 49 g by CMR. The correlation between the two methods was moderate, with a Lin index of 0.63 and good linear correlation (r = 0.63, P < 0.0001). The correlation was high when RT3DE was of high or adequate image quality. The correlation between LVM by M-mode and CMR was poor. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional echocardiography is an accurate method for the quantification of LVM in patients with different subtypes of HCM that is in better agreement with CMR reference values than M-mode measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Avegliano et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=48). Real time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) vs. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was evaluated on Left ventricular mass (LVM) (r = 0.63, p=< 0.0001). Real time 3D echocardiography showed good linear correlation with cardiac magnetic resonance for quantifying left ventricular mass in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients (r=0.63, P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: