Key result
Emergency Medical Dispatchers successfully completed an aspirin diagnostic and instruction tool in 69.8% of 44,141 cases involving chest pain or heart attack symptoms.
Why the study?
Can Emergency Medical Dispatchers effectively use a standardized aspirin diagnostic and instruction tool to provide early aspirin administration instructions to patients with chest pain?
Observational (n=44,141)
Yes
Can Emergency Medical Dispatchers effectively use a standardized aspirin diagnostic and instruction tool to provide early aspirin administration instructions to patients with chest pain?
Emergency medical dispatchers can successfully use a standardized protocol to instruct patients with potential acute coronary syndrome to take early aspirin prior to responder arrival in nearly 70% of cases.
May enable earlier aspirin via dispatchers in chest pain; leaves open outcome impact and need for prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: The American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association recommend early aspirin administration to patients with symptoms of acute coronary syndrome (ACS)/acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The primary objective of this study was to determine if Emergency Medical Dispatchers (EMD) can provide chest pain/heart attack patients with standardised instructions effectively, using an aspirin diagnostic and instruction tool (ADxT) within the Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) before arrival of an emergency response crew. METHODS: This retrospective study involved three dispatch centres in the UK and USA. We analysed 6 months of data involving chest pain/heart attack symptoms taken using the MPDS chest pain and heart problems/automated internal cardiac defibrillator protocols. RESULTS: The EMDs successfully completed the ADxT on 69.8% of the 44141 cases analysed. The patient's mean age was higher when the ADxT was completed, than when it was not (mean ± SD: 53.9 ± 19.9 and 49.9 ± 20.2; p<0.001, respectively). The ADxT completion rate was higher for second-party than first-party calls (70.3% and 69.0%; p=0.024, respectively). A higher percentage of male than female patients took aspirin (91.3% and 88.9%; p=0.001, respectively). Patients who took aspirin were significantly younger than those who did not (mean ± SD: 61.8 ± 17.5 and 64.7 ± 17.9, respectively). Unavailability of aspirin was the major reason (44.4%) why eligible patients did not take aspirin when advised. CONCLUSIONS: EMDs, using a standardised protocol, can enable early aspirin therapy to treat potential ACS/AMI prior to responders' arrival. Further research is required to assess reasons for not using the protocol, and the significance of the various associations discovered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barron et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Chest pain/heart attack symptoms (n=44,141). Aspirin diagnostic and instruction tool (ADxT) was evaluated on Successful completion of the ADxT by Emergency Medical Dispatchers. Emergency Medical Dispatchers successfully completed an aspirin diagnostic and instruction tool in 69.8% of 44,141 cases involving chest pain or heart attack symptoms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: