The sensitivity to sulphamethizole, sulphamethoxazole (SM), trimethoprim (TMP) and the combination SM/TMP of freshly isolated urinary tract pathogens from hospital patients was studied. Out of 798 strains tested primarily, 47% were found to be fully sensitive to sulphamethizole (tablet method), and 81% fully sensitive to the SM/TMP combination (disk method). Out of 423 strains with reduced sensitivity to sulphamethizole, 65% were fully sensitive to SM/TMP. Out of 391 strains tested secondarily (disk method), 39% were fully sensitive to SM, 68% fully sensitive to TMP, and 91% to SM/TMP. Of 283 strains presenting a reduced sensitivity to SM, 85% were fully sensitive to SM/TMP. In both series the isolated Streptococcus faecalis strains were highly resistant to sulphamethizole and SM, but presented a very high degree of sensitivity to TMP and SM/TMP. In contrast, nearly all isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were found to be resistant both to sulphonamides, TMP and SM/TMP. Of the 18 Staphylococcus aureus strains tested secondarily, 10 out of 12 multiresistant strains were fully sensitive to TMP. Synergy between SM and TMP could be demonstrated in 61% of the 391 strains tested secondarily. The synergic effect depended on the degree of sensitivity to SM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laursen et al. (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: