Key result
The hemodynamic component of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, based on the Rivers early goal-directed therapy protocol, may not be applicable to all septic patients due to differing physiological profiles.
Why the study?
Does early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) improve mortality in all patients with severe sepsis and septic shock?
Population
Patients with severe sepsis and septic shock
Comparison
Early goal-directed therapy according to the… vs Standard therapy or individualized hemodynamic…
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Sepsis resuscitation warrants cautious, individualized application rather than universal EGDT; leaves open phenotype-specific trials.
Does early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) improve mortality in all patients with severe sepsis and septic shock?
The universal application of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign's early goal-directed therapy protocol may be inappropriate, as the original trial cohort had significantly more severe baseline hypoxia and comorbidities than typical septic patients.
Azriel Perel (2008) conducted a review in Severe sepsis and septic shock. Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) vs. Standard therapy was evaluated. The hemodynamic component of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, based on the Rivers early goal-directed therapy protocol, may not be applicable to all septic patients due to differing physiological profiles.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: