Why the study?
Does the ECG reliably differentiate between Takotsubo cardiomyopathy and acute coronary syndrome?
Does the ECG reliably differentiate between Takotsubo cardiomyopathy and acute coronary syndrome?
This review highlights that ECG alone cannot reliably differentiate Takotsubo cardiomyopathy from acute coronary syndrome, and coronary angiography remains necessary for definitive diagnosis.
ECG cannot reliably differentiate Takotsubo cardiomyopathy from ACS; leaves open the need for validated noninvasive markers beyond angiography.
INTRODUCTION: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TC) is an acquired cardiomyopathy affecting mostly postmenopausal women mimicking an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). TC clinical presentation involves chest pain, elevated cardiac enzymes, wall motion abnormalities and electrocardiographic changes, all of which share striking similarities to ACS. Areas covered: Differential diagnosis between TC and ACS can be complex since there are no reliable and widely-accepted electrocardiographic criteria and, at the moment, only coronary angiography can rule out one of the two diagnoses with good certainty. The present review will discuss the pros and cons of the ECG in TC, focusing on how the signal changes through the acute phase, the hospitalization, and after discharge. Specific information will be provided for each component of the ECG trace, and potential pitfalls will be highlighted, in order get to the core of this important unmet clinical issue. Expert commentary: There are at least several reasons why the ECG is still not considered a useful tool in differential diagnosis between TC and ACS. These include recent awareness of the syndrome, lack of evidence-based therapy, and, more importantly, a wide range of ECG features according to race, patient characteristics, wall motion abnormalities, triggers, and time from symptoms onset.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guerra et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: