Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease frequently co-exist, but epidemiological data on atrial fibrillation in patients with CKD stage 4-5 are scarce.
Elevated Troponin T and increased left atrial volume index independently predict the development of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with severe chronic kidney disease.
Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are commonly co-existing conditions. However, data on epidemiology of AF in patients with CKD stage 4–5 is scarce. Methods We prospectively enrolled 210 consecutive non-dialysis patients with CKD stage 4–5 between 2013 and 2017. Follow-up data on AF incidence along with medical history, laboratory tests and echocardiography at baseline were gathered. Results At baseline, mean age was 62 years, estimated glomerular filtration rate 12.8 ml/min and 73/210 (34.8%) of the participants were female. Altogether 41/210 (19.5%) patients had a previous diagnosis of AF. After median follow-up of 46 [IQR 27] months, new-onset AF occurred in 33/169 (19.5%) patients (69.9 events/1000 person-years). Overall, 22/33 (66.7%) of patients with new-onset AF were identified with a triggering condition and 21/33 (63.6%) were receiving renal replacement therapy (dialysis or acquired kidney transplant) at the time of AF detection, respectively. In Cox proportional hazard model age > 60 years (HR 4.27, CI95% 1.57–11.64, p < 0.01), elevated troponin T (TnT) > 50 ng/l (HR 3.61, CI95% 1.55–8.37, p < 0.01) and left atrial volume index (LAVI) > 30 ml/m 2 (HR 4.82, CI95% 1.11-21.00, p = 0.04) independently predicted the incidence of new-onset AF. Conclusions The prevalence and incidence of AF was markedly high in this prospective study on patients with CKD stage 4–5. Elevated TnT and increased LAVI were identified as independent predictors for new-onset AF in patients with severe CKD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hakamäki et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: