This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective To compare the clinical and anamnestic characteristics of women with endometriosis alone versus those with both endometriosis and comorbid fibromyalgia, in order to identify distinguishing features between the two groups. Materials and methods A prospective observational study was conducted on a cohort of 668 patients diagnosed with endometriosis. Patients reporting symptoms suggestive of fibromyalgia were assessed using the Patient Self-Report Survey for the Assessment of Fibromyalgia . Those with positive screening scores were referred for a rheumatologic evaluation. In a subgroup of 47 patients, the diagnosis of fibromyalgia was confirmed using the 2016 ACR diagnostic criteria. Patients’ history and clinical profiles were compared between subjects with only endometriosis versus those with co-existent fibromyalgia. Results Fibromyalgia was diagnosed in 7% (n = 47) of patients with endometriosis. In 72.3% of cases, the diagnosis of endometriosis preceded the onset of fibromyalgia. Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) was the most common phenotype (55%) among patients with comorbid fibromyalgia. Chronic pelvic pain was significantly more prevalent in patients with fibromyalgia compared to those with only endometriosis (48.9% vs 24%; p < 0.05). Autoimmune comorbidities (51.1% vs 12.9%) and psychiatric disorders (17% vs 7.6%) were significantly more frequent in patients with both conditions (p < 0.05). Conclusion Endometriosis patients with comorbid fibromyalgia represent a distinct phenotypic subgroup, marked by a higher prevalence of autoimmune diseases, psychiatric disorders, and conditions related to central sensitization. Investigating early risk factors—such as chronic pelvic pain, surgical history, and coexisting comorbidities—may facilitate earlier identification and more targeted management of this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manzi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: