Specific aggregation of poly(α‐L‐glutamic acid) and hysteresis effects in aqueous solutions. I. Influence of temperature‐dependent aggregation on the optical rotation of PGA

The instability of aqueous solutions of poly(α‐ L ‐glutamic acid) (PGA) at low pH is due to two distinguishable phenomena: precipitation, favored above 40°C., and aggregation, favored below 20°C. The aggregated form of PGA can be isolated by gel permeation chromatography. Both aggregation and precipitation increase with decreasing pH, i.e., with decreasing ionization of the side chain carboxyl groups. Temperature‐induced aggregation and disaggregation give rise to a reproducible hysteresis loop which can be followed by optical rotation, light scattering, sedimentation, viscosity, and chromatography. Hysteresis has been observed with different PGA samples, and in several aqueous buffered or unbuffered solvents and organic‐aqueous solvent mixtures and in the pH range 4.1–4.5. Aggregation manifests itself as an increase in negative optical rotation in the visible and ultraviolet spectral range. The specific relation at 233 mμ is sensitive to aggregation and also reflects the hysteresis. Measurements of optical rotatory dispersion indicate that a 0 reflects the hysteresis but b 0 does not, the latter revealing only reversible changes with aggregation and disaggregation. The helix‐coil equilibrium is apparently unperturbed by aggregation, as is the thermal stability of the helix structure. For fully aggregated PGA it is estimated that a 0 increases by about 300 degrees, which suggests that a 0 may be a sensitive parameter to measure aggregation in other systems. The rate of aggregation increases with decreasing temperature. The disaggregation, upon heating, is more rapid. However, kinetics measurements have not yet been done. The temperature M at which all aggregates are disrupted increases with decreasing pH, but is independent of total PGA concentration, at constant pH. No molecular weight dependence of M was detected in the range 20–100 × 10 3 . The shape and size of the hysteresis loop depends upon pH and molecular weight, which is interpreted as a dependence on the extent of aggregation. One branch of the loop, representing the helix–coil transition of isolated molecules, is reversible, while the others, representing the formation and disruption of the aggregates, are not. The system exhibits both ascending and descending scanning curves, which are typical of a true hysteresis.