Why the study?
The study evaluated and compared the impact of Shenzhen's two-phase smoke-free regulation on incidence rates for ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.
Does a two-phase smoke-free regulation reduce the incidence of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in a resident population aged ≥35 years?
Does a two-phase smoke-free regulation reduce the incidence of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in a resident population aged ≥35 years?
Implementation of smoke-free regulations in public places significantly reduces the immediate incidence of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, with comprehensive city-wide legislation driving further gradual reductions in ischemic stroke.
May link phased smoke-free laws to reduced stroke incidence; hypothesis-generating for policy effects.
INTRODUCTION: The Shenzhen government is widely considered to be most efficiently implementing smoke-free legislation in China. We evaluated and compared the impact of Shenzhen's two-phase smoke-free regulation on the incidence rates for ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. METHODS: An interrupted time series design was used to capture immediate and annual incidence changes from 2007 to 2016 for both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke due to two-phase smoke-free regulation in Shenzhen, China, by using a generalized additive model. The first phase, implemented on 9 March 2010, required five main public places to be smoke-free. In the second phase, the comprehensive law was expanded to the whole city on 1 March 2014. RESULTS: The regulation implementation during phase I was associated with a strong immediate decline in the incidence rate of ischemic stroke (-14.2%, 95% CI: -19.6 - -8.4) and hemorrhagic stroke (-10.1%, 95% CI: -18.2 - -1.2), but without showing the annual changes (p>0.05). Following the implementation of the comprehensive law, the gradual annual effect showed a significant change in ischemic stroke, with a 6.3% (95% CI: 8.9 - -3.6) reduction. Neither the immediate nor gradual decreases in hemorrhagic stroke incidences associated with the comprehensive regulation were statistically significant during phase II (p>0.05). Subgroup analyses indicate that a much larger health effect of the regulation during phase I was greater among those aged ≥65 years than among those aged 35-64 years. CONCLUSIONS: Shenzhen's two-phase smoke-free regulation was well implemented. Even though the regulation did not extend to the whole city, the immediate health benefits on the incidence rates of ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke could be seen. However, the health benefits brought by the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free legislation were attenuated by previous smoke-free regulations in five main public places, which were more evident in hemorrhagic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: