Key result
Assisted reproductive technology conception was not significantly associated with differences in systolic blood pressure (MD -0.53 mmHg; 95% CI: -1.59 to 0.53) compared to natural conception.
Why the study?
Does assisted reproductive technology conception affect long-term cardiometabolic health outcomes in offspring compared to natural conception?
Meta-Analysis (n=35,938)
Yes
Does assisted reproductive technology conception affect long-term cardiometabolic health outcomes in offspring compared to natural conception?
ART conception is associated with small, non-significant differences in blood pressure and slightly higher cholesterol levels compared to natural conception, providing reassurance regarding long-term cardiometabolic health.
AIMS: To examine associations of assisted reproductive technology (ART) conception (vs. natural conception: NC) with offspring cardiometabolic health outcomes and whether these differ with age. METHODS AND RESULTS: Differences in systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), lipids, and hyperglycaemic/insulin resistance markers were examined using multiple linear regression models in 14 population-based birth cohorts in Europe, Australia, and Singapore, and results were combined using meta-analysis. Change in cardiometabolic outcomes from 2 to 26 years was examined using trajectory modelling of four cohorts with repeated measures. 35 938 (654 ART) offspring were included in the meta-analysis. Mean age ranged from 13 months to 27.4 years but was <10 years in 11/14 cohorts. Meta-analysis found no statistical difference (ART minus NC) in SBP (-0.53 mmHg; 95% CI:-1.59 to 0.53), DBP (-0.24 mmHg; -0.83 to 0.35), or HR (0.02 beat/min; -0.91 to 0.94). Total cholesterol (2.59%; 0.10-5.07), HDL cholesterol (4.16%; 2.52-5.81), LDL cholesterol (4.95%; 0.47-9.43) were statistically significantly higher in ART-conceived vs. NC offspring. No statistical difference was seen for triglycerides (TG), glucose, insulin, and glycated haemoglobin. Long-term follow-up of 17 244 (244 ART) births identified statistically significant associations between ART and lower predicted SBP/DBP in childhood, and subtle trajectories to higher SBP and TG in young adulthood; however, most differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: These findings of small and statistically non-significant differences in offspring cardiometabolic outcomes should reassure people receiving ART. Longer-term follow-up is warranted to investigate changes over adulthood in the risks of hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and preclinical and clinical cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elhakeem et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Cardiometabolic health in offspring (n=35,938). Assisted reproductive technology (ART) conception vs. Natural conception (NC) was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD -0.53 mmHg, 95% CI -1.59 to 0.53). Assisted reproductive technology conception was not significantly associated with differences in systolic blood pressure (MD -0.53 mmHg; 95% CI: -1.59 to 0.53) compared to natural conception.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: