The AT2-receptor is not involved in Angiotensin II-mediated enhancement of sympathetic nerve traffic in the rat isolated inferior vena cava.
AT2 receptors do not mediate Ang II-enhanced sympathetic outflow in this rat model; leaves open their role in other sympathetic pathways or species.
Angiotensin II (Ang II) enhances sympathetic neurotransmission via AT(1)-receptors located on sympathetic nerve terminals. We recently demonstrated that inhibition of Ang II-mediated facilitation in the pithed rat by irbesartan resulted in a U-shaped dose response curve, which was not observed when PD 123319, at a concentration that selectively blocks the AT(2)-receptor, was co-administered. Hence, the irbesartan-mediated upstroke might be explained by the involvement of the AT(2)-receptor after AT(1) blockade with high-dose irbesartan. In the present study, we further investigated the possible role of the AT(2)-receptor in Ang II-mediated facilitation in vitro. We studied the effect of the AT(2)-receptor antagonist PD 123319 (10 nM) on Ang II-enhanced sympathetic outflow evoked by electrical field stimulation (EFS) in the rat isolated inferior vena cava. Additionally, we investigated the effect of the AT(1)-receptor blocker irbesartan (0.1 nM 1 M) on the sequelae of Ang II-enhanced, EFS-evoked sympathetic nerve traffic in the presence or absence of PD 123319 (10 nM). PD 123319 did not influence Ang II-enhanced sympathetic outflow. Irbesartan dose-dependently attenuate Ang II-augmented transmitter release (pIC50 7.99+0.03), whereas no U-shaped concentration-response relationship for irbesartan was observed. Co-administration of PD 123319 with irbesartan proved unable to influence Ang II-mediated facilitation differently compared with irbesartan alone. The experimental observations indicate that the AT(2)-receptor is not involved in Ang II-mediated enhancement of sympathetic nerve traffic in the present in vitro study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nap et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: