Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Patient rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a continuing challenge for physical therapists. This study compared the effectiveness of an established protocol to a new program which included Protonics exercise. Sixty patient (42 males and 18 females; mean age = 24.7 +/- 3.9 years; age range = 19-30 years) were randomly assigned into two groups: Group 1 received the established protocol and Group 2 received a Protonics exercise regimen. Both groups were measured for the time needed for return to unrestricted activity on the basis of objective, functional, and clinical exams; all tests were repeated at a 1-year follow-up exam. Group 2 completed treatment an average of 3.3 weeks sooner than Group 1 (mean = 19.8 vs. 23.1 weeks) at an average lower cost of $990.00 per subject. All subjects had good functional outcomes at the 1-year follow-up exam. It was concluded that the Protonics exercise program was more clinically and cost-effective than the other program, although both methods were successful for postsurgical anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kent E. Timm (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: