Why the study?
Does omapatrilat reduce blood pressure and improve insulin sensitivity in an animal model of insulin resistance?
Does omapatrilat reduce blood pressure and improve insulin sensitivity in an animal model of insulin resistance?
In an animal model of insulin resistance, omapatrilat lowered systolic blood pressure more effectively than fosinopril and improved insulin sensitivity.
Provides preclinical support for omapatrilat in insulin-resistant models; leaves open translation to human hypertension management.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of omapatrilat, fosinopril and placebo on blood pressure, plasma insulin, glucose and triglycerides concentrations in Zucker rats, a model for insulin resistance. DESIGN: Double blind, parallel, prospective trial. METHODS: Forty-two male obese Zucker (falfa) rats (aged 13-18 week) initially weighing 400-600 g were used for the experiments. Omapatrilat (n = 14), placebo (n = 14) or fosinopril (n = 14) were administrated once daily at 10 micromol/kg oral for 15 days. At baseline and at the end of the study, a tail-cuff blood pressure measurement was performed; an oral glucose tolerance test was done at the end of the study. RESULTS: Omapatrilat and fosinopril resulted in significant lower systolic blood pressure compared to the placebo group (p < 0.001). This parameter was significantly lower in the omapatrilat group compared with fosinopril-treated rats (116+/-9 vs 125+/-4 mmHg, p < 0.05). After an overnight fast, there was no difference in the fasting glucose concentrations among treatment groups. The basal and post-glucose challenge insulin concentrations were lower in the omapatrilat group compared to the placebo group. No difference was observed in the fasting triglycerides concentrations between the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to placebo and fosinopril treatment, omapatrilat results in lower arterial blood pressure in an animal model of insulin resistance. The results suggest that omapatrilat may have a positive effect on insulin sensitivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aguilar‐Salinas et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: