Why the study?
Does intravenous atriography improve the diagnosis of pericardial effusion?
Does intravenous atriography improve the diagnosis of pericardial effusion?
The paper discusses the use of intravenous atriography for diagnosing pericardial effusion, though the provided text is truncated.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid pericardial effusion diagnosis; leaves open prospective validation against modern imaging.
THE diagnosis of pericardial effusion and pericarditis is often difficult. The history and physical signs can be misleading, and the electrocardiogram is frequently equivocal. A high index of suspicion is necessary if the diagnosis is not to be missed though recognition becomes easier in the presence of typical central chest pain together with a friction rub synchronous with the heartbeat, and the presence of a known pathogenic agent – for example, infection or tumor. Effusion may be from many causes, but the commonest encountered are infections and tumors of the mediastinum, particularly bronchial carcinoma and the reticuloses. When the fluid . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roger Pyle (1966) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: