This study was planned on the assumptions that different high-voltage activated calcium channels and/or the ability of mitochondria to take up Ca(2+) could be responsible for different cytosolic Ca(2+) concentrations ([Ca(2+)](c)) and catecholamine release responses in adrenal chromaffin cells of bovine and mouse species. Short K(+) pulses (2-5 s, 70 mM K(+)) increased [Ca(2+)](c) to a peak of about 1 microM; however, in bovine cells the decline was slower than in mouse cells. Secretory responses were faster in mouse but were otherwise quantitatively similar. Upon longer K(+) applications (1 min), elevations of [Ca(2+)](c) and secretion were prolonged in bovine cells; in contrast [Ca(2+)](c) in mouse cells declined three-fold faster and failed to sustain a continued secretion. Confocal [Ca(2+)](c) imaging following a 50-ms depolarizing pulse showed a similar Ca(2+) entry, but a rate of [Ca(2+)](c) increase and a maximum peak significantly higher in bovine cells; the rate of dissipation of the Ca(2+) wave was faster in the mouse. The mitochondrial protonophore CCCP (2 microm) halved the K(+)-evoked [Ca(2+)](c) and secretory signals in mouse cells, but had little affect on bovine responses. We conclude that the relative densities of L (15% in bovine and 50% in mouse) and P/Q Ca(2+) channels (50% in bovine and 15% in mouse) do not contribute to the observed differences; rather, the different intracellular distribution of Ca(2+), which is strongly influenced by mitochondria, is responsible for a more sustained secretory response in bovine, and for a faster and more transient secretory response in mouse chromaffin cells. It seems that mitochondria near the plasmalemma sequester Ca(2+) more rapidly and efficiently in the mouse than in the bovine chromaffin cell.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alés et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: