Why the study?
No consensus or published criteria existed to define or describe a virulent PRRSV strain compared to classical strains despite reports of virulent outbreaks.
This review proposes the first approximation of criteria to define virulent PRRSV strains to address the lack of consensus in the field.
Offers preliminary criteria for virulent PRRSV amid field consensus gaps; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is the causative agent of the, probably, most economically important disease for the pig industry worldwide. This disease, characterised by producing reproductive failure in sows and respiratory problems in growing pigs, appeared in the late 1980s in the United States and Canada. Since its appearance, strains capable of producing higher mortality rates as well as greater severity in clinical signs and lesions than classical strains have been identified. However, since the first reports of these "virulent" PRRSV outbreaks, no homogeneity and consensus in their description have been established. Moreover, to the authors' knowledge, there is no published information related to the criteria that a PRRSV strain should fulfil to be considered as a "virulent" strain. In this review, we revise the terminology used and gather the information related to the main characteristics and differences in clinical signs, lesions, viral replication and tropism as well as immunological parameters between virulent and classical PRRSV strains and propose a first approximation to the criteria to define a virulent PRRSV strain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruedas‐Torres et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: