Why the study?
A multicenter trial evaluating automated and semi-automated 3DE LV quantification was needed to assess feasibility, reproducibility, and generate normative z-score values in pediatric patients.
Does automated quantification improve the reproducibility of 3D echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular volumes and function compared to semi-automated quantification in healthy children?
Does automated quantification improve the reproducibility of 3D echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular volumes and function compared to semi-automated quantification in healthy children?
Semi-automated 3D echocardiography provides reliable and reproducible left ventricular volume and function measurements in children, allowing for the generation of normative Z-scores, whereas fully automated quantification currently lacks reproducibility.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports semi-automated 3D echocardiography for pediatric normative Z-scores; leaves open whether automated quantification can achieve consistent multicenter reproducibility.
Background: Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) evaluation of left ventricular (LV) volume and function in pediatrics compares favorably with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A multicenter trial with automated and semi-automated LV quantification allows for generation of normative data in large pediatric patients. The aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of measuring three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) volumes and function in pediatric patients in a multicenter trial; to determine if automated software (without contouring edits) will improve the reproducibility in volume and function analysis; and thus establish normal z score values in this unique population. Methods: Six hundred and ninety-eight healthy children (ages 0 to 18 years) were recruited from 5 centers. Left ventricular (LV) 3DE was acquired from the 4-chamber view. A vendor independent software analyzed end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), and ejection fraction (EF) using automated and semi-automated quantification. Feasibility and reproducibility were assessed. Body surface area (BSA) based z-scores were generated. Results: Feasibility was 79% (523/658). Reproducibility was good between centers using the semi-automated quantification. Reproducibility was decreased using the automated quantification. Therefore, Z-scores were generated for ESV, EDV, and SV using the semi-automated method. Conclusions: 3DE can reliably evaluate LV volumes and EF in pediatric patients at different centers. We report pediatric Z-scores for normal LV volumes using the semi-automated method. Further optimization of technology will be necessary for reliable use of fully automated quantification by 3DE in children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jone et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: