Why the study?
It was hypothesized that left ventricular and left atrial volume ratio (LVLAVR) assessed by 3DE reflects age- and gender-related changes in left chamber size, but reference values and associated parameters were not established.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LVLAVR assessed by 3D echocardiography provides a sensitive parameter reflecting age- and gender-related changes in left heart chamber size, with established reference values for healthy subjects.
We hypothesized that left ventricular and left atrial volume ratio (LVLAVR) assessed by three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) reflects age- and gender-related change in left chamber size. We aimed to (1) determine the reference values of LVLAVR, (2) investigate their age and gender dependency, and (3) clarify which anthropometric and echocardiography parameters are closely associated with these indices. Both left ventricular (LV) and left atrial (LA) volume curves were obtained using 3DE speckle tracking analytical software, and the LVLAVR curve throughout one cardiac cycle was created, from which LVLAVR at ventricular end-diastole and at ventricular end-systole were determined in 313 healthy subjects (age, 20-85 years; 51% men). The mean values of LVLAVR at ventricular end-diastole and ventricular end-systole in male subjects were 5.74 ± 1.54 and 1.37 ± 0.35, respectively. Corresponding values in female subjects were significantly lower (5.20 ± 1.47, p = .003 and 1.13 ± 0.29, p < .001) than the values in male subjects. LVLAVR at ventricular end-diastole step wisely decreased to advanced aging, and had a highest F ratio compared with other left chamber volumetric parameters in both genders. LV mass and LA ejection fraction were significantly associated with LVLAVR at ventricular end-diastole. In contrast, LV mass and LV ejection fraction were significantly coupled with LVLAVR at ventricular end-systole. This study provides the reference values for LVLAVR from a relatively large number of healthy subjects. LVLAVR may be a sensitive parameter to reflect age- and gender-related change in LV and LA volumes. Further studies should be required to determine its clinical usefulness over traditional echocardiography parameters in various cardiovascular diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takeuchi et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: