Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The interaction of β-lactamase inhibitory protein II (BLIP-II) with β-lactamases serves as a model system to investigate the principles underlying protein–protein interactions. Previous studies have focused on identifying the determinants of binding affinity and specificity between BLIP-II and class A β-lactamases. However, interactions between BLIP-II and other bacterial proteins have yet to be explored. Here, we provide evidence that BLIP-II binds penicillin binding protein 2a (PBP2a) from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with a K D in the low micromolar range. In comparison to the binding constants for the potent interaction between BLIP-II and TEM-1 β-lactamase ( K D = 0.5 pM), the on-rate for BLIP-II binding PBP2a is 44 000 times slower and the off-rate is 170 times faster. Therefore, a slow association rate is a limiting factor for the potency of the interaction between BLIP-II and PBP2a. Results from alanine scanning mutagenesis of the predicted interface residues of BLIP-II indicate that charged residues on the periphery of the BLIP-II interface play a critical role for binding PBP2a, in contrast to previous findings that aromatic residues at the center of the BLIP-II interface are critical for the interaction with β-lactamases. Interestingly, many of the alanine mutants at the BLIP-II interface increase k on for binding PBP2a, consistent with the association rate being a limiting factor for affinity. In summary, the results of the study reveal that BLIP-II binds PBP2a, although weakly compared to binding of β-lactamases, and provides insights into the different binding strategies used for these targets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adamski et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: