Why the study?
Catheter ablation success in atrial flutter depends on identifying the electroanatomic circuit, typically requiring invasive EP study, but noninvasive determination via surface ECG using machine learning had not been established.
Does machine learning applied to surface ECGs accurately classify the atrial flutter macroreentry circuit in patients with AFL?
Does machine learning applied to surface ECGs accurately classify the atrial flutter macroreentry circuit in patients with AFL?
Machine learning applied to surface ECGs can accurately classify atrial flutter macroreentry circuits, potentially reducing the need for invasive diagnostic mapping.
May support noninvasive AFL circuit classification; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVE: Atrial Flutter (AFL) is a supraventricular tachyarrhythmia typically arising from a macroreentry circuit that can have variable atrial anatomy. It is often treated by catheter ablation, the success of which depends upon the correct determination of the electroanatomic circuit, generally through invasive electrophysiological (EP) study. We hypothesized that machine learning (ML) methods applied to the diagnostic 12-lead surface electrocardiogram (ECG) could determine the specific circuit prior to any invasive EP study. METHODS: The 12-lead ECGs were reduced to eight independent leads: I, II, V1 - V6. Through an algorithm using ventricular complex cancellation methods, windows of atrial activity in the ECG were uncovered and spectra were generated. Three ML classifier approaches were applied: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and their outputs combined using soft voting. RESULTS: Ten-second surface ECGs taken from 419 AFL patients prior to invasive EP study and ablation were analyzed retrospectively. Of the 419 patients, 285 had typical cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent AFL, 41 had atypical right-atrial AFL and 93 had left-atrial AFL, as determined during the subsequent EP study. Lead V5 was found to be most useful giving a test accuracy of 98% and f1 score of 0.97. CONCLUSION: We conclude that ML methods have the potential to automatically determine the AFL macroreentry circuit from the surface ECG. SIGNIFICANCE: The AFL classification method presented in this investigation achieves 95+% accuracy on an unbalanced inter-patient dataset which has important clinical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2021 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: