This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Lithium-ion battery electrochemical models require an accurate description of the electrodes microstructures to be predictive, that can be achieved through nanoscale imaging. Such observations are however limited by their field of view (FOV), as they provide only a subset of the whole electrode volume that does not necessarily represent the whole electrode microstructure heterogeneity, and therefore can bias the analysis. A representativity analysis has been performed on the microstructure parameters and, in a novel way, on the full cell electrochemical response to evaluate the predictions representativeness, and thus relevance, of a microstructure scale electrochemical model. The microstructure parameter deviation propagations to the electrochemical response have been quantified for different charge rates. This defines a threshold for the microstructure parameters FOV for a desired maximum deviation of the electrochemical response. Electrochemical model shows cell representative section areas are increasing with C-rate, due to higher in-plane heterogeneities, indicating larger FOVs are required specifically for fast charge modeling. Representativity analysis determines a cell FOV of 144.4 × 154.4 μm 2 is large enough to establish a convergence on the representative section areas for low-intermediate C-rate (≤2.5 C), therefore positively concludes on the model representativeness for these rates, but is not large enough to conclude for higher rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Usseglio‐Viretta et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: