Why the study?
Venous thromboembolism is an important patient safety issue in plastic surgery, requiring clinical trial evidence to guide postoperative prophylactic anticoagulation strategies.
Does weight-based enoxaparin (0.5 mg/kg twice daily) improve pharmacokinetic endpoints compared to fixed-dose enoxaparin (40 mg twice daily) in plastic surgery inpatients?
Does weight-based enoxaparin (0.5 mg/kg twice daily) improve pharmacokinetic endpoints compared to fixed-dose enoxaparin (40 mg twice daily) in plastic surgery inpatients?
This paper describes the methodology for an ongoing trial comparing weight-based versus fixed-dose enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis in plastic surgery inpatients.
Venous thromboembolism is an important patient safety in plastic surgery, and multiple clinical trials in the past 10 years have provided increased understanding of the risks and benefits of venous thromboembolism prevention strategies. This paper provides an exhaustive discussion of the rationale behind and methodology for an in progress randomized double-blind clinical trial in plastic surgery inpatients, in which the 2 study arms are enoxaparin 40 mg twice daily and enoxaparin 0.5 mg/kg twice daily. The trial's primary aims are to: (1) demonstrate whether enoxaparin 0.5 mg/kg twice daily is superior to enoxaparin 40 mg twice daily for the pharmacokinetic endpoint of overanticoagulation (anti-Factor Xa > 0.4 IU/mL) and (2) demonstrate whether enoxaparin 0.5 mg/kg twice daily is not inferior to enoxaparin 40 mg twice daily for the pharmacokinetic endpoint of underanticoagulation (anti-Factor Xa < 0.2 IU/mL). The results of this trial will provide Level I evidence to help guide plastic surgeon's choice of postoperative prophylactic anticoagulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pannucci et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: