Heart and Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery (LAD) Exposure from Hypo-Fractionated Whole Breast Radiotherapy with a Prone Setup

Background: Prone breast radiotherapy has been shown to optimally spare the dose to the heart and lungs; we report on the heart and left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) dosimetry and their implications for current care. Aims: (I) To measure the mean heart dose (MHD) and LAD mean and maximum doses (Dmean and Dmax) in patients with left-side breast cancer who have undergone hypo-fractionated whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with a concomitant boost to the post-operative cavity (40.50 Gy to the breast and 48 Gy to the cavity in 15 fractions) in the prone position; (II) to compare the dosimetry results to those reported in the literature for other techniques. Materials and Methods: In a consecutive series of 524 irradiated left-side breast cancer patients, heart and LAD dosimetry data were collected and correlated to breast volume and the volume of the radiation boost to the tumor cavity. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed to compare the same dosimetry data with those reported in the literature from supine techniques. To account for dosimetry differences in hypo-fractionation and conventional fractionated regimens (50–60 Gy in 25–30 fractions) reported in the literature, the cardiac doses were converted to the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2). As previously reported, the prone setup protocol placed the medial edges of the tangential radiation fields at least 2.5 mm from the contoured LAD. Results: In all patients’ plans, the target coverage was successfully achieved. The mean values (±SD) were as follows: MHD = 0.69 Gy (±0.19) (EQD2 0.35 Gy ± 0.1); LAD Dmean = 2.20 Gy (±0.68) (EQD2 1.18 Gy ± 0.35); LAD Dmax = 4.44 Gy (±1.82) (EQD2 2.55 Gy ± 0.97). The values were consistently lower compared with those achieved by the multiple supine techniques reported in the literature. Spearman’s correlation analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between LAD and heart dosimetry variables. In contrast, no strong correlation was observed between the cardiac dose metrics and breast volume, boost volume, or their ratio index. A linear correlation was detected between LAD Dmean and LAD D2% (R2 0.64); LAD D2% and heart D2% (R2 0.60); LAD Dmax and heart D2% (R2 0.41). Conclusions: The prone position protocol minimizes heart and LAD exposure. This approach results in a dosimetry advantage when compared with more complex and expensive WBRT techniques in the supine position.