Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three groups of students used IBM card punchboards to receive immediate knowledge of results after each of one-half of the items on multiple-choice tests and received delayed knowledge of results on the remaining items. Two-way analysis of variance was used to test for significant differences in the results under the two conditions on each of ten 1-hour examinations and on a final examination. There were no statistically significant differences in means under immediate and delayed knowledge of results on any of the 1-hour examinations. The difference in results on the final examination, however, was significant beyond the .05 level in favor of immediate knowledge. Immediate item-by-item knowledge of results thus did not depress test performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard O. Beeson (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: