Why the study?
Do novel missense variants of unknown significance cause functional channel abnormalities in patients with Long QT syndrome?
Do novel missense variants of unknown significance cause functional channel abnormalities in patients with Long QT syndrome?
Functional characterization of novel missense variants of unknown significance in LQTS patients frequently reveals loss-of-function phenotypes, highlighting the importance of heterologous studies for variant classification.
Functional studies aid LQTS VUS classification; leaves open effects on clinical risk and management.
The Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a disorder characterized by a prolongation of the QT interval and a propensity to ventricular tachyarrhythmias, which may lead to syncope, cardiac arrest, or sudden death. Our objective was to (1) determine the incidence of variants with unknown significance (VUS) in a cohort of consecutive LQTS patients and (2) to determine the percentage of those with novel missense VUS that have demonstrable functional channel abnormalities from a single referral center. We performed genetic screening of candidate genes in 39 probands with a diagnosis of LQTS to identify mutations and variants. Seven variants of unknown significance were identified, six were missense variants and one was a splice site variant. We investigated the six novel missense VUS in five patients; three missense variants in KCNQ1 (L236R, W379R, Y522S) and three missense variants in KCNH2 (R35W, S620G, V491I). We employed two-electrode voltage-clamp experiments in Xenopus laevis oocytes and confocal imaging to characterize the novel missense mutations functionally. We revealed electrophysiological and trafficking loss-of-function phenotypes. This report emphasizes the frequency of adverse channel function in patients with LQTS and the importance of heterologous studies to define channel function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steffensen et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: