Why the study?
Trauma codes improve hemorrhagic shock outcomes, but whether similar multidisciplinary protocols can improve delivery of care for other causes of hemorrhagic shock, such as ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms, remains unclear.
Does a dedicated code protocol reduce delays to care milestones for patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Does a dedicated code protocol reduce delays to care milestones for patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Implementing a dedicated 'CodeAAA' protocol for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms may reduce delays to care milestones, similar to established trauma codes.
Summary: Expediting life-saving care for hemorrhagic shock through multi-disciplinary code protocols is a potential method to improve outcomes. Trauma codes have become standard of care at most tertiary care centres; however, it is unclear if similar protocols can improve delivery of care for other forms of hemorrhagic shock. We examined the feasibility of a code protocol for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs) by reviewing the literature and comparing patient outcomes for RAAA and trauma patients at our institution, where the latter have a wellestablished trauma code protocol. We show that, despite being similarly unstable, patients with RAAA experienced delays to care milestones compared with trauma patients, even when accounting for diagnostic delays. Combining these data with present understanding of factors implicated in RAAA survival, we propose that a “CodeAAA” protocol may fill an important gap in RAAA care and that further prospective studies examining the utility of such a code are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chehroudi et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: