Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Econometric modeling reveals valuation risk requires corrected preference weights to explain asset price and cash-flow dynamics, indicating robust support in long-run risk frameworks.
This paper shows the recent success of valuation risk (time-preference shocks in Epstein-Zin utility) in resolving asset pricing puzzles rests sensitively on an undesirable asymptote that occurs because the preference specification fails to satisfy a key restriction on the weights in the Epstein-Zin time-aggregator. When we revise the preferences to satisfy the restriction in a simple asset pricing model, the puzzles resurface. However, when estimating a sequence of Bansal-Yaron long-run risk models, we find valuation risk under the revised specification consistently improves the ability of the models to match asset price and cash-flow dynamics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Groot et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: