Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary: Serial ultrasonic cephalometry and maternal 24‐hour urinary oestrogen assays were performed on 400 patients who were considered on clinical grounds to be at risk of having a small‐for‐dates fetus. It was found that serial cephalometry was a better indicator of fetal well‐being than urinary oestrogen assays. Serial cephalometry enabled dysmaturity to be predicted in 90% of patients, compared with 70% by serial oestrogen assays. The false positive and false negative diagnoses using serial cephalometry were 12% and 10%, respectively, compared with 22% and 30%, using oestrogen assays. It was also noted that serial cephalometry was significantly better than oestrogen assays in predicting perinatal asphyxia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thankam Varma (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: