Interventional trial demonstrates maintained cerebral autoregulation and carbon dioxide reactivity despite reduced blood pressure under propofol, indicating preserved brain perfusion.
Background and objectives The aim of our study was to assess systemic and cerebral hemodynamic changes as well as cerebral CO 2 -reactivity during propofol anesthesia. Methods 27 patients undergoing general anesthesia were enrolled. Anesthesia was maintained using the Target-Controlled Infusion (TCI) method according to the Schnider model, effect site propofol concentration of 4 μg.mL -1 . Ventilatory settings (respiratory rate and tidal volume) were adjusted to reach and maintain 40, 35, and 30 mmHg EtCO 2 for 5 minutes, respectively. At the end of each period, transcranial Doppler and hemodynamic parameters using applanation tonometry were recorded. Results Systemic mean arterial pressure significantly decreased during anesthetic induction and remained unchanged during the entire study period. Central aortic and peripherial pulse pressure did not change significantly during anesthetic induction and maintenance, whereas augmentation index as marker of arterial stiffness significantly decreased during the anesthetic induction and remained stable at the time points when target CO 2 levels were reached. Both cerebral autoregulation and cerebral CO 2 -reactivity was maintained during propofol anesthesia. Conclusions Propofol at clinically administered doses using the Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA/TCI) technique decreases systemic blood pressure, but does not affect static cerebral autoregulation, flow-metabolism coupling and cerebrovascular CO 2 reactivity. According to our measurements, propofol may exert its systemic hemodynamic effect through venodilation . Trial registration The study was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov , identifier: NCT02203097, registration date: July 29, 2014.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juhász et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: