Why the study?
The lack of unified regulations for the surgical treatment of esophageal diseases necessitates exploring new approaches such as Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS).
The implementation of ERAS and a multidisciplinary approach in esophageal surgery may improve outcomes by replacing ineffective established treatment principles.
Lacks standardized ERAS protocols in esophageal surgery; leaves open safe implementation amid high complication risks.
This review is devoted to new trends in esophageal surgery due to the introduction of ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery). Currently, the absence of a single regulation for the surgical treatment of patients with esophageal diseases requires the search for new directions and research in this area. However, any innovations always cause alertness among surgeons, which is associated with a high risk of postoperative complications and an increase in the mortality rate. The article discusses new reports proving the ineffectiveness of many established principles of treatment, and also demonstrates the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of such patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dvoretsky et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: