Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have measured the relative calcium-binding energies of amino acids using tandem mass spectrometry of Ca(2+)-bound trimeric amino acids. Although calcium-bound dimeric amino acid complexes coordinated too strongly to allow observation of the two competing dissociation products (calcium-bound monomeric ions) required for analysis of their metal binding affinities using the conventional kinetic method, the Ca(2+)-bound trimeric cluster ions dissociated readily to form dimeric cluster ions through simple ligand losses. The calcium-binding energies were obtained by comparing the ratio of the [Ca(2+)(A(1))(2) - H(+)](+) and [Ca(2+) (A(1))(A(2)) - H(+)](+) ions that dissociated from the [Ca(2+) (A(1))(2)(A(2)) - H(+)](+) ion and the ratio of the [Ca(2+)(A(2))(2) - H(+)](+) and [Ca(2+)(A(1)) (A(2)) - H(+)](+) ions that dissociated from the [Ca(2+)(A(1))(A(2))(2) - H(+)](+) ion, where A(1) and A(2) represent two amino acids. The energies deduced from this analysis represent the relative average binding energies of complexes having the form [Ca(2+)(A(1))(2) - H(+)](+). The relative Ca(2+)-binding strengths of the alpha-amino acid complexes follow the order Cys < Ser < Thr < Ile < Leu < Val < Gly < Ala < Pro < Phe < Met < Tyr < Asn < His < Gln < Trp < Lys < Arg. To our knowledge, this report provides the first example of using kinetic methods to determine the relative binding strengths of divalent metal-amino acid complexes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ho et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: