Why the study?
What are the optimal anticoagulant prophylaxis options and dosing regimens for preventing venous thromboembolism in at-risk medical patients?
What are the optimal anticoagulant prophylaxis options and dosing regimens for preventing venous thromboembolism in at-risk medical patients?
This review emphasizes the importance of a systemwide approach to risk stratification and appropriate pharmacologic prophylaxis for VTE in at-risk medical patients.
Encourages systemwide VTE risk stratification in medical patients; confirms consensus recommendations while leaving optimal regimens open.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a clinically silent and potentially fatal disease that manifests as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism. Venous thromboembolism remains a serious public health challenge, with an ever-increasing odds ratio of occurrence given the aging population in the United States. This article reviews the epidemiology of VTE; risk factor identification and stratification as a means of advancing awareness, prevention, and detection of VTE; and prophylaxis options and their outcomes, particularly administration of unfractionated heparin (UFH) 5000 U subcutaneously every 12 versus 8 hours in the at-risk medical patient population. The important studies comparing outcomes of these different UFH dosing regimens compared with placebo and low-molecular-weight heparins also are discussed. Consensus recommendations shaping contemporary clinical practice guidelines in this setting are highlighted. A systemwide approach to treatment of all medical patients who are risk stratified and receiving appropriate pharmacologic prophylaxis is recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deitelzweig et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: