Why the study?
Does a combination of clinical and scintigraphic protocols accurately diagnose acute pulmonary embolism in patients with clinical suspicion?
Does a combination of clinical and scintigraphic protocols accurately diagnose acute pulmonary embolism in patients with clinical suspicion?
A combined clinical and scintigraphic probability model can effectively rule in or rule out acute pulmonary embolism when probabilities are high or low, respectively, though intermediate probabilities remain uncertain.
Supports ruling out/in acute PE with congruent low/high probabilities; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
PURPOSE: To study the use of a combination of a clinical and scintigraphic protocol in relation to the final outcome diagnosis in patients with clinical suspicion of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 170 patients with clinical suspicion of acute PE were all examined with ECG, blood chemistry, chest X-ray, pulmonary scintigraphy and selective pulmonary arteriography. The scintigraphic and clinical probabilities of PE were estimated on visual analogue scales (VASs) by different readers unaware of each others' results. The follow-up time was 6 months. In order to establish the final diagnosis a final outcome committee was created. They analysed in retrospect all the clinical and laboratory data and established whether the patient had had PE or not. RESULTS: The final outcome committee concluded that 53 patients had PE. When the scintigraphic and clinical probability judgements were congruent, a combined probability of 1-25% (i.e low probability) had a negative predictive value of 98%. When the combined probability was 26-75% (i.e. intermediate) half of the cases had PE. With a combined probability of 76-100% (i.e. high) the positive predictive value was 100%. CONCLUSION: By applying a model of combined clinical and scintigraphic probabilities for PE, the diagnosis is ruled in when the combined probability is high, and ruled out when the combined probability is low. However, nearly half of the patients will still have an uncertain diagnosis for which further diagnostic procedures may be allocated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nilsson et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: