Neurosurgical patients in the UK, especially those undergoing emergency surgery, may not receive effective prophylaxis against thromboembolism.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Many UK neurosurgical patients may lack effective VTE prophylaxis; leaves open optimal regimens and outcome impact.
Venous thromboembolism is a life threatening, but preventable complication of major surgery. Many neurosurgical patients are at high risk of developing thromboembolic disease. A postal survey was undertaken of 44 UK neurosurgical centres to assess the use of physical and pharmacological methods of prophylaxis against thromboembolism. Thirty-five replies were received from 31 centres. Seventy-seven per cent of units used antiembolism stockings (TEDs) for elective surgery and 37% for emergency surgery; in approximately two-thirds of these units TEDs constituted the sole method of prophylaxis used during both elective and emergency surgery. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) was utilized in 37 and 11% of units for elective and emergency surgery, respectively. Subcutaneous heparin was used in 32% of units perioperatively including 6% of emergency cases. These findings suggest that neurosurgical patients, who are at moderate to high risk of developing thromboembolic complications, may not receive effective prophylaxis; those undergoing emergency neurosurgery are less likely to receive any form of prophylaxis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monica Stephens (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: