Why the study?
Carvedilol ameliorates doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity, but the main contributor between its enantiomers was not clear.
Does S-carvedilol provide superior protection against doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity compared to racemic carvedilol and R-carvedilol in HUVECs and rats?
Does S-carvedilol provide superior protection against doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity compared to racemic carvedilol and R-carvedilol in HUVECs and rats?
S-carvedilol provides superior protection against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity and endothelial damage compared to racemic carvedilol and R-carvedilol in preclinical models.
Hypothesis-generating for S-carvedilol in doxorubicin cardiotoxicity; requires human trials before clinical consideration.
Doxorubicin (DOX) is a highly active anticancer drug with severe cytotoxicity, which is strongly associated with oxidative stress. Carvedilol (CAR), used as its racemate with S-CAR and R-CAR (1:1), has been previously reported to ameliorate the DOX-induced cytotoxicity. However, the main contributor from CAR of its protective effects has not been clear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate further the different effects of CAR enantiomers on DOX-induced cytotoxicity in human umbilical vein endothelial cells and rats, respectively. Results indicated that S-CAR could significantly attenuate DOX-induced cell death, apoptotic morphological changes, decrease the mitochondrial membrane potential and oxidative stress responses by increasing the superoxide dismutase and catalase activities, and decreasing malondialdehyde contents and reactive oxygen species levels via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT/endothelial nitric oxide synthase pathway in vitro. Consistent with the in vitro study, the protective effects of S-CAR on the myocardial tissues and hemodynamics were also detected in rats suffering because of DOX treatment. With the obtained results, we can first conclude that S-CAR provides superior protection to injury induced by DOX relative to that of racemic CAR and R-CAR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: